B.S.N.L. vs TELECOM REGULATORY AUTH. OF INDIA — C.A. No. 6202/2009

Case under Telegraph & Telecom Laws : Telegraph & Telecom Laws Section XVII-B. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010233392009

Filing Date

07-Aug-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 6202/2009

Diary Number

23339/2009

Order Date

09-Jan-2020

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Telegraph & Telecom Laws : Telegraph & Telecom laws Section XVII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.B.S.N.L.

    Adv. ABHINAV MUKERJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) MOHIT PAUL[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TELECOM REGULATORY AUTH. OF INDIA

    Adv. SANJAY KAPUR ABHIJAT P. MEDH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. 09-Jan-2020

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - II

  2. 03-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 18-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 01-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 22-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 21-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 06-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 26-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 09-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 05-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 07-Aug-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6202/2009

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 6126/2009

casestatus.in Summary

On 03/08/2011, the Supreme Court heard C.A. No. 6202/2009 (B.S.N.L. v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) along with related appeals. The court received statements of case from both the appellant and respondents, including from Advocates Sanjay Kumar and A.P. Medh (whose delayed filing was condoned). Both parties confirmed no further procedural steps were required, and the matter was directed to be placed before the bench for substantive hearing as per court rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case