MAHARSHI MAHESH YOGI VEDIC VISH.VID. vs STATE OF M.P.. — C.A. No. 390/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010232022009

Filing Date

06-Aug-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 390/2010

Diary Number

23202/2009

Order Date

02-Sep-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHARSHI MAHESH YOGI VEDIC VISH.VID.

    Adv. MUSHTAQ AHMAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF M.P..

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 23-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 11-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-Sep-2009
  8. 21-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 06-Aug-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 390/2010

  10. 09-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 24-Apr-2009
  12. 30-Mar-2009
  13. 27-Feb-2009
  14. 16-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 29-Jan-2009
  16. 13-Jan-2009
  17. 01-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 01-Dec-2008
  19. 21-Oct-2008
  20. 04-Sep-2008
  21. 29-Jul-2008
  22. 09-May-2008
  23. 16-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 07-Apr-2008
  25. 14-Mar-2008
  26. 12-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 22-Feb-2008
  28. 13-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 30-Jan-2008
  30. 23-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 09-Jan-2008
  32. 05-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 13-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

On 02/09/2011, the Supreme Court heard 19 interlocutory applications (IAs) filed in multiple civil appeals by Maharshi M.Y. Vedic Vishwavidyala against Narendra Kumar Saudharshan and others. The Court, comprising Justices Markandey Katju and Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, rejected all the interlocutory applications after hearing counsel for both parties. No further directions or next hearing date were specified in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case