PEERU LAL (DEAD)BY L.RS. vs TEEKAM CHAND (DEAD) — C.A. No. 2091/2007

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010232002005

Filing Date

21-Oct-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 2091/2007

Diary Number

23200/2005

Order Date

25-Jul-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PEERU LAL (DEAD)BY L.RS.

    Adv. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TEEKAM CHAND (DEAD)

    Adv. S. K. BHATTACHARYA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Jul-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Jul-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  4. 24-Jul-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  5. 02-May-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 02-May-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit

  7. 20-Mar-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 20-Mar-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  9. 06-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Feb-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy

  11. 30-Jan-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Jan-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy

  13. 29-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 29-Nov-2017

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  15. 10-Oct-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 10-Oct-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  17. 01-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 01-Aug-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

  19. 20-Jul-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre

  20. 19-Jul-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre

  21. 18-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 11-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 11-Apr-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 11-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 30-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 30-Jan-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 30-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 12-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 12-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 16-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 16-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 16-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 13-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 16-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 08-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 17-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 20-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 22-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 17-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 17-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 29-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 28-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 10-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 31-Jul-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 27-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 11-Nov-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 21-Oct-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2091/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 2091/2007 On July 25, 2018, the Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by Peeru Lal's legal representatives against Teekam Chand and others. The Court allowed the application to delete the name of deceased Respondent No.1 (Late Teekam Chand) and substituted the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.2 (Mukesh) on record. Finding no cogent reason to entertain the appeal and determining that the impugned judgment warranted no interference, the Court dismissed the appeal with all pending applications disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case