HARI DUTT vs KAMAL SINGH — C.A. No. 2436/2010
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010230912009
Filing Date
06-Aug-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 2436/2010
Diary Number
23091/2009
Order Date
07-Aug-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARI DUTT
Adv. ABHIJAT P. MEDH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAMAL SINGH
Adv. RAJESH SRIVASTAVA E. C. AGRAWALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
06-Aug-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
01-Aug-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
31-Jul-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
18-Feb-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2436/2010
Summary: Civil Appeal No. 2436/2010 (Hari Dutt v. Kamal Singh) The Supreme Court dismissed Hari Dutt's appeal on 7 August 2019, affirming the High Court of Himachal Pradesh's order that declared a power of attorney (dated 3 September 1986) and sale deed (dated 1 October 1986) as illegal and void due to fraud and misrepresentation. The Court found that none of the substantial questions of law raised met the threshold under Section 100 CPC and, having reviewed the pleadings and evidence, found no reason to deviate from the First Appellate Court's findings. No costs were awarded and all pending applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts