CHEETUBHAI GORDHANBHAI PATEL vs GUJ.INDUSTRIAL DEVT.CORP.. — SLP(C) No. 22847 - 22848/2009

Case under Section III-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010230332009

Filing Date

04-Aug-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 22847 - 22848/2009

Diary Number

23033/2009

Order Date

08-Nov-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHEETUBHAI GORDHANBHAI PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GUJ.INDUSTRIAL DEVT.CORP..

    Adv. HEMANTIKA WAHI ANIP SACHTHEY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 29-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 11-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 28-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 08-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 21-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 12-May-2010
  12. 12-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 25-Feb-2010
  14. 19-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 25-Jan-2010
  16. 25-Jan-2010
  17. 12-Jan-2010
  18. 05-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 18-Dec-2009
  20. 15-Dec-2009
  21. 06-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 29-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 18-Sep-2009
  24. 16-Sep-2009
  25. 04-Aug-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 22847 - 22848/2009

  26. 04-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 20-Apr-2009
  28. 13-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 06-Apr-2009
  30. 09-Feb-2009
  31. 27-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 22847-22848/2009 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed all special leave petitions. The Court upheld the Gujarat High Court's judgment fixing land compensation at Rs.65 per square meter, rejecting the Corporation's challenge to using smaller sale transactions as valuation basis and affirming the 40% development cost deduction. Key Finding: The Court held that sale instances of smaller land parcels can validly determine market value for larger tracts when appropriate deductions are made, and that courts should ordinarily rely on the highest-value sale instances when multiple comparables exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case