THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH THE SECRETARY vs M/S. JIWAN SINGH JOGINDER SINGH — C.A. No. 8537/2009

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010229082008

Filing Date

12-Aug-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 8537/2009

Diary Number

22908/2008

Order Date

20-Nov-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH THE SECRETARY

    Adv. ABHINAV MUKERJI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. JIWAN SINGH JOGINDER SINGH

    Adv. RONY OOMMEN JOHN[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Nov-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 20-Nov-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant

  4. 17-Oct-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 17-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 11-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 22-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 14-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 19-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 11-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 27-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 26-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 19-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 03-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 15-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 12-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8537/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 008537/2009 The Supreme Court partly allowed Himachal Pradesh's appeal, setting aside the High Court's March 2008 judgment which had decided the sales tax matter on merits despite an alternative remedy being available. The Court directed that if the respondent files an appeal under Section 30 of the Act within 10 weeks, it shall not be dismissed on limitation grounds and will be decided expeditiously, with all points remaining open except constitutional validity of Section 5A. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case