OM PARKASH . vs STATE OF HARYANA . — C.A. No. 1452/2011

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010228892008

Filing Date

11-Aug-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 1452/2011

Diary Number

22889/2008

Order Date

07-Feb-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OM PARKASH .

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA .

    Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 21-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 07-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 15-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 18-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 03-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 19-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 19-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 24-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 13-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 11-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 03-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 17-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 29-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 11-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1452/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Om Parkash v. State of Haryana (C.A. No. 001452/2011) The Supreme Court granted leave and set aside the High Court's judgment dismissing the appellants' writ petition challenging land acquisition notifications under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court found the High Court's disposal improper as it failed to record reasons or findings on the multiple issues raised despite hearing the case on merit. The matter was remitted to the High Court for de novo consideration with directions to record findings. Status quo regarding construction, possession, and land title was extended for four weeks, with respondents permitted to file an additional affidavit within that period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case