CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION vs M/S FORTPOINT AUTOMOTIVE PVT LTD — C.A. No. 9342/2013

Case under Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Slps Relating to Appointment of Arbitrator, Arising Out of Applications Under Section 8, Removal of Arbitrator, Termination of Mandate of Arbitrator Under Arbitration Act, 1940, and Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Section III. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010226672010

Filing Date

21-Jul-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 9342/2013

Diary Number

22667/2010

Order Date

15-Feb-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : SLPs relating to appointment of arbitrator, arising out of applications under Section 8, removal of arbitrator, termination of mandate of arbitrator under Arbitration Act, 1940, and Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION

    Adv. RACHNA GUPTA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S FORTPOINT AUTOMOTIVE PVT LTD

    Adv. A. V. RANGAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. 15-Feb-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 15-Feb-2024

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  3. 15-Feb-2024

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  4. 12-Sep-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 27-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 08-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 22-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 20-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 21-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9342/2013

casestatus.in Summary

On 15-02-2024, the Supreme Court heard Civil Appeal No. 9342/2013 between Central Warehousing Corporation (appellant) and M/S Fortpoint Automotive Pvt Ltd (respondent). The Court directed that the matter be listed before a different bench where Justice Abhay S. Oka would not be a member, effectively deferring substantive consideration of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case