AMITAVA BANERJEE vs HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL — W.P.(C) No. 388/2009
Case under Judiciary : Appointment/termination/removal of Judicial Officers and Their Any Service Condition Section X. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010226142009
Filing Date
31-Jul-2009
Registration No
W.P.(C) No. 388/2009
Diary Number
22614/2009
Order Date
04-Mar-2020
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMITAVA BANERJEE
Adv. AMITA SINGH KALKAL[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL
Adv. KUNAL CHATTERJI[R-1] PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-2]
Case History
-
04-Mar-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
-
03-Mar-2020
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
-
28-Nov-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
-
21-Nov-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Nov-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant
-
06-Mar-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Sep-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(C) No. 388/2009
Summary of W.P.(C) No. 388/2009 – Amitava Banerjee v. High Court of Calcutta (04-03-2020) In this hearing, the Supreme Court found that case records pertaining to the petitioner's 1993-1994 suspension allegations were not traceable—the proceedings had been lost twice. The petitioner, who has since superannuated, was kept suspended for an extended period. The Court directed the matter to be treated as part-heard and requested the High Court to find a workable solution to mitigate the hardship suffered. The case was listed for hearing after 8 weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts