U.A.BASHEER vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — C.A. No. 3032/2010
Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010225692009
Filing Date
31-Jul-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 3032/2010
Diary Number
22569/2009
Order Date
17-Feb-2021
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2021 INSC 95
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.U.A.BASHEER
Adv. VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. ANITHA SHENOY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Feb-2021
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran
-
10-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran
-
09-Feb-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
03-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3032/2010
-
[ 2021 INSC 95 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
SUMMARY The Supreme Court partially set aside the High Court's dismissal in this Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act case. While upholding that a post-Act partition deed cannot defeat excess land determination, the Court found the High Court failed to adjudicate critical factual questions: whether appellant possessed the disputed property and thus had standing to invoke abatement provisions of the Repeal Act (1999). The case was remitted to the High Court's Division Bench for fresh consideration of possession, allowing additional evidence, to finally resolve whether proceedings should abate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts