STATE OF RAJASTHAN . vs DAGALA RAM — C.A. No. 3298/2014

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010225482008

Filing Date

07-Aug-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 3298/2014

Diary Number

22548/2008

Order Date

05-Mar-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN .

    Adv. P. V. YOGESWARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAGALA RAM

    Adv. BRIJ BHUSHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 03-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 24-Jan-2014
  6. 24-Sep-2013
  7. 26-Aug-2013
  8. 12-Aug-2013
  9. 16-Jul-2013
  10. 12-Jul-2013
  11. 15-Apr-2013
  12. 18-Mar-2013
  13. 30-Nov-2012
  14. 31-Aug-2012
  15. 21-Aug-2012
  16. 08-May-2012
  17. 10-Apr-2012
  18. 22-Mar-2012
  19. 25-Jan-2012
  20. 02-Dec-2011
  21. 14-Oct-2011
  22. 23-Sep-2011
  23. 05-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 11-Jul-2011
  25. 05-Jul-2011
  26. 13-Apr-2011
  27. 23-Feb-2011
  28. 26-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 27-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 16-Jul-2010
  31. 06-May-2010
  32. 16-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 05-Apr-2010
  34. 23-Feb-2010
  35. 08-Feb-2010
  36. 27-Jan-2010
  37. 27-Nov-2009
  38. 13-Nov-2009
  39. 07-Sep-2009
  40. 17-Aug-2009
  41. 12-Aug-2009
  42. 03-Aug-2009
  43. 15-Jul-2009
  44. 09-Jul-2009
  45. 16-Jun-2009
  46. 02-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 16-Jan-2009
  48. 12-Jan-2009
  49. 01-Sep-2008
  50. 07-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3298/2014

  51. 30-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 14-Mar-2008
  53. 12-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 15-Feb-2008
  55. 24-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 19-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  57. 17-Sep-2007
  58. 07-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  59. 16-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. 27-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  61. 24-Aug-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  62. 17-Apr-2006
  63. 03-Apr-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  64. 20-Mar-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CA No. 3298/2014 The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Rajasthan's appeal challenging the High Court's decision that employees were entitled to pension benefits from their first appointment dates, even without provident fund contributions. The Court held that Rule 10(2) of the Pension Rules, which denied pension to non-contributors, was unconstitutional; employees absorbed from the State Agriculture Department into the Marketing Board had their service benefits protected under bye-laws and could count prior service for pension computation. The appellants were directed to pay Rs. 5,000 costs to each respondent for unnecessary litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case