THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN HOME DEPARTMENT THE SECRETARY vs PRABHAT — Crl.A. No. 2441/2009
Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010225242008
Filing Date
07-Aug-2008
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 2441/2009
Diary Number
22524/2008
Order Date
04-Apr-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN HOME DEPARTMENT THE SECRETARY
Adv. MILIND KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRABHAT
Adv. P. K. JAIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra
-
03-Apr-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra
-
28-Feb-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra
-
14-Feb-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra
-
19-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2008
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2441/2009
Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Prabhat (Crl.A. No. 2441/2009) The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Rajasthan's appeal on April 4, 2019. The trial court had convicted Prabhat under Section 302/34, IPC (murder) with life imprisonment, but the High Court downgraded it to Section 304 Part-II, IPC (causing death by negligence) and sentenced him to time already served (over six years), acquitting his two co-accused. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment, finding that since the incident occurred suddenly during a land dispute between cousins without premeditation, the High Court's view that the offense was under Section 304 Part-II rather than Section 302 was plausible and reasonable. No further action was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts