THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN HOME DEPARTMENT THE SECRETARY vs PRABHAT — Crl.A. No. 2441/2009

Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010225242008

Filing Date

07-Aug-2008

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 2441/2009

Diary Number

22524/2008

Order Date

04-Apr-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN HOME DEPARTMENT THE SECRETARY

    Adv. MILIND KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRABHAT

    Adv. P. K. JAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Apr-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra

  4. 03-Apr-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra

  5. 28-Feb-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra

  6. 14-Feb-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra

  7. 19-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 19-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 17-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 20-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2441/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Prabhat (Crl.A. No. 2441/2009) The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Rajasthan's appeal on April 4, 2019. The trial court had convicted Prabhat under Section 302/34, IPC (murder) with life imprisonment, but the High Court downgraded it to Section 304 Part-II, IPC (causing death by negligence) and sentenced him to time already served (over six years), acquitting his two co-accused. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment, finding that since the incident occurred suddenly during a land dispute between cousins without premeditation, the High Court's view that the offense was under Section 304 Part-II rather than Section 302 was plausible and reasonable. No further action was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case