U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD vs MAIKU . — SLP(C) No. 26624/2004
Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010224462004
Filing Date
12-Oct-2004
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 26624/2004
Diary Number
22446/2004
Order Date
02-Jul-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD
Adv. VISHWAJIT SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAIKU .
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
17-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
09-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
10-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
06-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
11-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
15-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
18-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2009
ROPView PDF
-
03-Nov-2009
ROPView PDF
-
05-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2008
ROPView PDF
-
10-Jul-2008
ROPView PDF
-
14-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
14-May-2008
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
03-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Apr-2006
ROPView PDF
-
30-Sep-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Dec-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Oct-2004
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 26624/2004
On 02/07/2012, the Supreme Court heard SLP(C) No. 26624/2004 and related petitions filed by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against Maiku and others, arising from a High Court judgment dated 13/02/2004. The Court found the controversy covered by its precedent decision in Sardar Jogendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2008 (17) SCC 133) and dismissed all special leave petitions accordingly. Pending applications, if any, were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts