CORPORATION BANK . vs MR. SHIVARUDRAYYA — C.A. No. 2554/2011
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010223772008
Filing Date
06-Aug-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 2554/2011
Diary Number
22377/2008
Order Date
26-Sep-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CORPORATION BANK .
Adv. GAURAV KEJRIWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.MR. SHIVARUDRAYYA
Adv. ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Sep-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
25-Sep-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
24-Sep-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2554/2011
Summary of C.A. No. 002554/2011 On 26 September 2019, the Supreme Court dismissed Corporation Bank's appeal against Mr. Shivarudrayya. All three lower forums (District Consumer Forum Bagalkot, Karnataka State Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, and National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission) had concluded that the bank failed to produce its loan account. Although the Court noted the bank's failure to produce account books would have been beneficial to the forums, it declined to interfere after examining the bank's audit account. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts