SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD. vs C.I.T.,DELHI — C.A. No. 6964 - 6965/2015
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010223282009
Filing Date
29-Jul-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 6964 - 6965/2015
Diary Number
22328/2009
Order Date
14-Nov-2022
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2022 INSC 1201
Disposal Type
Partly Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD.
Adv. BHARGAVA V. DESAI[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.C.I.T.,DELHI
Adv. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Nov-2022
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna
-
29-Sep-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh
-
28-Sep-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Sep-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh
-
27-Sep-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Sep-2022
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh
-
30-Aug-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Aug-2022
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari
-
16-Dec-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
15-Dec-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
14-Dec-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
09-Dec-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
08-Dec-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
07-Dec-2021
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
-
09-Feb-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
25-Jan-2018
Ordinary
Registrar (J) - II
-
17-Nov-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
09-Aug-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
09-Aug-2016
ROPView PDF
-
30-Jun-2016
ROPView PDF
-
30-Jun-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
30-Jun-2016
ROPView PDF
-
30-Mar-2016
ROPView PDF
-
30-Mar-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
30-Mar-2016
ROPView PDF
-
08-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
08-Feb-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
08-Feb-2016
ROPView PDF
-
12-Jan-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
08-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6964 - 6965/2015
-
[ 2022 INSC 1201 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary: Singapore Airlines Ltd. v. CIT, Delhi (C.A. No. 006964-006965/2015) Decision: The Supreme Court held that airlines must deduct tax at source (TDS) under Section 194H on supplementary commissions earned by travel agents, but limited recovery since the agents already paid income tax on these amounts. Penalties were quashed. Key Reasoning: The Court found that travel agents act as principals' agents under Passenger Sales Agency Agreements, making supplementary commissions (amounts charged above the airline's net fare) subject to TDS as "commission" under Section 194H read with Contract Act Section 182. Although the airlines lacked control over final ticket prices, this doesn't exempt them from TDS obligations since agency relationships permit agents discretion. The BSP billing system made TDS calculation practical and feasible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts