CHANDER SINGH vs STATE OF M.P. . — Crl.A. No. 1414/2018

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010223032008

Filing Date

06-Aug-2008

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1414/2018

Diary Number

22303/2008

Order Date

19-Nov-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDER SINGH

    Adv. VARUN PUNIA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF M.P. .

    Adv. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Nov-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 19-Nov-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  4. 23-Apr-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 23-Apr-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 13-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 22-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 26-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 06-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 28-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 13-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 27-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 23-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 19-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 17-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 18-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 06-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1414/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Crl.A. No. 001414/2018 (Chander Singh v. State of M.P.) The Supreme Court acquitted Chander Singh on November 19, 2018, setting aside his conviction under Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. Singh had been sentenced to six months imprisonment in 2003 for selling milk food products with 18.07% fat content instead of the required 20%. The Court found that the case against the appellant could not be proved beyond reasonable doubt, particularly rejecting the prosecution's arguments regarding sample handling procedures and acquitting him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case