APPOLLO PAPER MILLS LTD. vs CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION — C.A. No. 7657 - 7658/2014
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010222912011
Filing Date
19-Jul-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 7657 - 7658/2014
Diary Number
22291/2011
Order Date
18-Jan-2024
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Withdrawn
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.APPOLLO PAPER MILLS LTD.
Adv. AMIT PAWAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION
Adv. RACHNA GUPTA[R-1] RACHNA GUPTA[R-2] RACHNA GUPTA[R-3]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jan-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar
-
10-Jan-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar
-
07-Dec-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta
-
06-Dec-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta
-
23-Nov-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7657 - 7658/2014
On January 18, 2024, the Supreme Court modified its previous order dated January 11, 2024, in Civil Appeals No. 7657-7658/2014 between Appollo Paper Mills Ltd. and Central Warehousing Corporation. The Court dismissed the civil appeals as withdrawn, but crucially kept all contentions open for being argued before the appropriate lower court. This allows the parties to pursue their claims in a suitable forum without being barred by the Supreme Court's dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts