MUNNA GUPTA vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH HOME DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER — Crl.A. No. 717/2011

Case under 1511Ten-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(cases Where Sentence of More Than 10 Years Imprisonment Is Imposed) Section II-C. Status: Sclsc Disposed.

Sclsc Disposed

CNR: SCIN010222512010

Filing Date

19-Jul-2010

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 717/2011

Diary Number

22251/2010

Order Date

29-May-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Appeals Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

1511TEN-Criminal Law : Criminal matters other than covered by the aforesaid categories(Cases where sentence of more than 10 years imprisonment is imposed) Section II-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNNA GUPTA

    Adv. A. SUMATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH HOME DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated) PRASHANT KUMAR UMRAO[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-May-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 29-May-2024

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma

  4. 16-Feb-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 02-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 19-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 717/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Munna Gupta v. State of Chhattisgarh (Crl.A. No. 717/2011) The Supreme Court partially allowed Munna Gupta's appeal and reduced his sentence from 10 years rigorous imprisonment to the period already undergone (7 years). Though the Court upheld the dacoity conviction under Section 395 IPC, it found merit in reducing the sentence considering Gupta had served 70% of the sentence, was granted bail on 14.03.2011, maintained clean conduct thereafter with no subsequent criminal charges. The fine of Rs. 300 remains payable, with the Supreme Court Legal Service Committee directed to assist if unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case