DR. B. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY vs PEELA. POTHINAIDU . — C.A. No. 6486 - 6487/2005

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010222492005

Filing Date

07-Oct-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 6486 - 6487/2005

Diary Number

22249/2005

Order Date

02-Apr-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR. B. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY

    Adv. P. VINAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PEELA. POTHINAIDU .

    Adv. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN G. N. REDDY GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 30-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 25-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 18-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 11-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 28-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 20-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 12-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 22-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 27-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 19-Oct-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 07-Oct-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6486 - 6487/2005

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Dr. B. Madhusudhan Reddy v. Peela Pothinaidu (C.A. 6486-6487/2005) The Supreme Court disposed of these consolidated appeals concerning the Yeleru irrigation scam on April 2, 2014. The case involved challenges to Government of Andhra Pradesh orders reconstituting the Justice B.K. Somasekhara Commission of Inquiry after prior orders deemed it ceased to exist. The Court reviewed the government's status reports detailing disciplinary action against 21 government employees, one sub-judge, one government pleader, and five judicial staff. Six officials had already received punishment and one judicial officer was dismissed. The Court directed the state government to take all pending criminal, civil, and disciplinary proceedings to their logical conclusion, including criminal appeals pending before the High Court and 782 pending land acquisition cases, requesting expedited resolution within six months where possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case