DR. B. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY vs PEELA. POTHINAIDU . — C.A. No. 6486 - 6487/2005
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010222492005
Filing Date
07-Oct-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 6486 - 6487/2005
Diary Number
22249/2005
Order Date
02-Apr-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR. B. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY
Adv. P. VINAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.PEELA. POTHINAIDU .
Adv. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN G. N. REDDY GUNTUR PRABHAKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Oct-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6486 - 6487/2005
Case Summary Dr. B. Madhusudhan Reddy v. Peela Pothinaidu (C.A. 6486-6487/2005) The Supreme Court disposed of these consolidated appeals concerning the Yeleru irrigation scam on April 2, 2014. The case involved challenges to Government of Andhra Pradesh orders reconstituting the Justice B.K. Somasekhara Commission of Inquiry after prior orders deemed it ceased to exist. The Court reviewed the government's status reports detailing disciplinary action against 21 government employees, one sub-judge, one government pleader, and five judicial staff. Six officials had already received punishment and one judicial officer was dismissed. The Court directed the state government to take all pending criminal, civil, and disciplinary proceedings to their logical conclusion, including criminal appeals pending before the High Court and 782 pending land acquisition cases, requesting expedited resolution within six months where possible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts