THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE vs KALLA JATAV — Crl.A. No. 1355/2011

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010222422010

Filing Date

19-Jul-2010

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1355/2011

Diary Number

22242/2010

Order Date

10-Oct-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE

    Adv. C. D. SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALLA JATAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Oct-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 10-Oct-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy

  4. 21-Sep-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud

  5. 20-Sep-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud

  6. 19-Sep-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud

  7. 07-Sep-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud

  8. 31-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 31-Aug-2017

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud

  10. 24-Aug-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 24-Aug-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant

  12. 23-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 12-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 19-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1355/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Crl.A. No. 001355/2011 - State of Madhya Pradesh v. Kalla Jatav The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal on October 10, 2017, upholding the High Court's acquittal of Kalla Jatav. Accused of burning his wife to death (Sections 302 and 436, IPC), Jatav was initially convicted by the trial court but acquitted by the High Court. The Supreme Court found the prosecution's circumstantial evidence unreliable due to contradictory witness statements, lack of credible eyewitnesses, and failure to establish motive, entitling the accused to the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case