ANIRUDH JHINA THR.MR.J.C.JHINA vs M/S.PRIMAL HOLDING LTD. . — SLP(C) No. 23593/2008
Case under Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010219952008
Filing Date
04-Aug-2008
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 23593/2008
Diary Number
21995/2008
Order Date
11-Nov-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANIRUDH JHINA THR.MR.J.C.JHINA
Adv. YASH PAL DHINGRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S.PRIMAL HOLDING LTD. .
Adv. E. C. AGRAWALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Aug-2008
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 23593/2008
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 023593/2008 Anirudh Jhina v. M/S. Primal Holding Ltd. (11/11/2013) The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's special leave petition challenging the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order. Although lower forums found the petitioner (a prize-winner of a Mercedes Van) was a consumer, the National Commission held the respondent was not guilty of unfair trade practice or service deficiency, and ruled the petitioner liable for income tax under Section 194B and registration/road tax charges. The Court rejected the petitioner's new argument regarding depreciation depreciation compensation (₹9,58,735) as it was never raised before the National Commission. The petition was dismissed as the Court agreed the respondent bore no liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts