M/S GOODYEAR INDIA LTD. vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI — C.A. No. 7703 - 7707/2012
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010219242008
Filing Date
02-Aug-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 7703 - 7707/2012
Diary Number
21924/2008
Order Date
16-Oct-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S GOODYEAR INDIA LTD.
Adv. KAVITA JHA (Designated as Senior Advocate) [P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI
Adv. B. V. BALARAM DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Oct-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Oct-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
15-Oct-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
03-Oct-2019
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
01-Oct-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7703 - 7707/2012
Summary: Goodyear India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi The Supreme Court allowed Goodyear India's appeals against the High Court's judgment, which had reversed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's (ITAT) decision deleting undisclosed income. The Court found that the High Court wrongly treated Goodyear's without-prejudice letters to the tax department as admissions of non-disclosure, when they were merely refutals of published allegations. Critically, the disclosure in question originated from the parent company's US filings, not from Goodyear India itself. The Court restored the ITAT's judgment, holding that its factual analysis was reasonable and required no interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts