THE STATE OF HARYANA DEPARTMENT OF HOME FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY vs OM PRAKASH ASI — C.A. No. 220/2011

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010218982008

Filing Date

01-Aug-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 220/2011

Diary Number

21898/2008

Order Date

14-Aug-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HARYANA DEPARTMENT OF HOME FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

    Adv. NARESH BAKSHI MONIKA GUSAIN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.OM PRAKASH ASI (Assistant Sub-Inspector)

    Adv. AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Aug-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Aug-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  4. 08-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 16-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 26-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 22-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 09-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 03-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 04-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 17-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 16-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 29-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 04-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 18-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 16-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 28-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 01-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 220/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Haryana v. Om Prakash ASI (C.A. 220/2011) The Supreme Court dismissed Haryana's appeal challenging the High Court's 2008 order that upheld Om Prakash's promotion to ASI with benefits. Haryana had withdrawn the promotion order in 2005, claiming undue benefits were awarded, but the Court found his promotion was valid—against a regular vacancy within prescribed quota, made when his service record was excellent and he faced no departmental inquiry. Since Om Prakash had already retired in 2009, reversing the order would wrongfully withdraw accrued benefits. The Court upheld the High Court's reasoning and dismissed the appeal with no interim relief granted; each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case