THE STATE OF HARYANA DEPARTMENT OF HOME FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY vs OM PRAKASH ASI — C.A. No. 220/2011
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010218982008
Filing Date
01-Aug-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 220/2011
Diary Number
21898/2008
Order Date
14-Aug-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HARYANA DEPARTMENT OF HOME FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
Adv. NARESH BAKSHI MONIKA GUSAIN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.OM PRAKASH ASI (Assistant Sub-Inspector)
Adv. AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Aug-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph
-
08-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 220/2011
Case Summary: State of Haryana v. Om Prakash ASI (C.A. 220/2011) The Supreme Court dismissed Haryana's appeal challenging the High Court's 2008 order that upheld Om Prakash's promotion to ASI with benefits. Haryana had withdrawn the promotion order in 2005, claiming undue benefits were awarded, but the Court found his promotion was valid—against a regular vacancy within prescribed quota, made when his service record was excellent and he faced no departmental inquiry. Since Om Prakash had already retired in 2009, reversing the order would wrongfully withdraw accrued benefits. The Court upheld the High Court's reasoning and dismissed the appeal with no interim relief granted; each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts