STATE OF ORISSA . vs PRASANTA KUMAR PATTNAIK . — SLP(C) No. 29986/2008

Case under Section XI-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010218302008

Filing Date

01-Aug-2008

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 29986/2008

Diary Number

21830/2008

Order Date

11-Feb-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ORISSA .

    Adv. RADHA SHYAM JENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRASANTA KUMAR PATTNAIK .

    Adv. PRANAB KUMAR MULLICK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 26-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 30-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 27-Jul-2009
  10. 13-Jul-2009
  11. 15-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-May-2009
  13. 23-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 23-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 20-Mar-2009
  16. 18-Mar-2009
  17. 27-Feb-2009
  18. 25-Feb-2009
  19. 18-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 13-Jan-2009
  21. 07-Jan-2009
  22. 07-Jan-2009
  23. 07-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 05-Dec-2008
  25. 01-Dec-2008
  26. 26-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 10-Nov-2008
  28. 19-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 25-Aug-2008
  30. 13-Aug-2008
  31. 08-Aug-2008
  32. 01-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 29986/2008

  33. 18-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SLP(C) No. 29986/2008 - State of Orissa v. Prasanta Kumar Pattnaik On 11 February 2011, the Supreme Court heard multiple consolidated Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Orissa challenging a High Court of Orissa judgment dated 6 November 2007. SLP(C) No. 29986/2008 was dismissed by the Court on the grounds of delay in filing (for which no reasonable explanation was provided) and lack of merit. However, the Court left open any questions of law that may arise from the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case