RAJESH KUMAR AGRAWAL vs MANISH SHARMA — C.A. No. 9541/2013

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010216892008

Filing Date

31-Jul-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 9541/2013

Diary Number

21689/2008

Order Date

18-Oct-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR AGRAWAL

    Adv. REKHA PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANISH SHARMA

    Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR DUBEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 26-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 05-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 06-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 19-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 03-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 26-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 19-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 31-Jul-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9541/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rajesh Kumar Agrawal v. Manish Sharma (C.A. 9541/2013) The Supreme Court allowed Rajesh Kumar Agrawal's appeal and set aside orders from the District Judge and High Court. The core dispute concerns whether arbitration proceedings between the parties concluded and whether an arbitral award was actually made. The Court found that this factual issue must first be resolved before addressing the merits of Agrawal's Section 9 application seeking injunction and receiver appointment regarding dissolved partnership property. Outcome & Next Steps: The matter was remitted to the District Judge to frame and decide the factual dispute regarding completion of arbitration proceedings, with a directive to dispose of the Section 9 application within six months. Parties may file additional applications for appropriate relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case