P.T.BEENA ROY vs STATE OF KERALA . — SLP(C) No. 24777/2010

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010216412010

Filing Date

14-Jul-2010

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 24777/2010

Diary Number

21641/2010

Order Date

25-Jul-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.T.BEENA ROY

    Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KERALA .

    Adv. BINA MADHAVAN A. RAGHUNATH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 24-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 12-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 01-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 21-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 23-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 23-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 06-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 14-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 12-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 20-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 07-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 04-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 06-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 25-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 06-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 14-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 24777/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed P.T. Beena Roy's special leave petition challenging the promotion of Smt. Anitha Vasanth as Headmistress. The Court held that Roy's seniority should be counted only from November 7, 1996 (when she returned to her parent school), not from 1980, because she had been declared surplus and worked as a Protected Teacher elsewhere from 1985-1996. Since Roy had not completed the requisite 12 years of service in her parent school by the promotion date (June 1, 2006), the competent authority lawfully promoted the more senior respondent No.5. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case