PADMINI SIVA SUBRAMANIAM vs V.LAKSHMI . — CONMT.PET.(C) No. 158 - 159/2008

Case under Section Z_NOT KNOWN. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010215362008

Filing Date

30-Jul-2008

Registration No

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 158 - 159/2008

Diary Number

21536/2008

Order Date

01-Apr-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section Z_NOT KNOWN

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PADMINI SIVA SUBRAMANIAM

    Adv. R. V. KAMESHWARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V.LAKSHMI .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 08-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 13-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 25-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 04-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 27-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 24-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 24-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 10-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 24-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 23-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 05-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 22-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 04-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 30-Jul-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 158 - 159/2008

  21. 28-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 15-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 13-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 06-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 06-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 06-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CONMT.PET.(C) No. 158-159/2008 On 01/04/2011, the Supreme Court dismissed the contempt petitions as infructuous. The court found no valid grounds to interfere with the Madras High Court's order upholding a 2006 notification, noting that Rs. 2.27 crore had been deposited by the petitioner with Indian Overseas Bank. The Debts Recovery Tribunal was directed to proceed and dispose of the underlying matter expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case