BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. vs CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA — C.A. No. 7034/2011

Case under Telegraph & Telecom Laws : Telegraph & Telecom Laws Section XVII-B. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010212882011

Filing Date

12-Jul-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 7034/2011

Diary Number

21288/2011

Order Date

09-Nov-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Telegraph & Telecom Laws : Telegraph & Telecom laws Section XVII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.

    Adv. GAURAV SHARMA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) MOHIT PAUL[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA

    Adv. GAUTAM NARAYAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) BINA GUPTA AMRISH KUMAR[R-16]

Case History

  1. 09-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  2. 09-Nov-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  3. 08-Jan-2016
  4. 08-Jan-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  5. 08-Jan-2016
  6. 11-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 03-May-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 15-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 06-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 24-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 13-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 05-Nov-2012
  15. 02-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 17-Oct-2012
  17. 21-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 06-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 09-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 12-Jul-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7034/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Appeal No. 7034/2011 heard on 09-11-2017, BSNL challenged a decision against the Cellular Operators Association of India. The Supreme Court directed counsel for both parties to file their statements of case within the statutory period. After expiry of the statutory period, the matter was to be listed before the Court for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case