SUPER RELIGARE LABORATORIES LTD. vs GOOD HEALTH MEDICAL SERVICES LTD. — ARBIT.PETITON No. 12/2010

Case under Section PIL-W. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010211872010

Filing Date

12-Jul-2010

Registration No

ARBIT.PETITON No. 12/2010

Diary Number

21187/2010

Order Date

03-May-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section PIL-W

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUPER RELIGARE LABORATORIES LTD.

    Adv. NAVIN CHAWLA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOOD HEALTH MEDICAL SERVICES LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 10-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 20-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 07-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 11-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 02-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 01-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 12-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 24-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 12-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARBIT.PETITON No. 12/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Super Religare Laboratories Ltd. v. Good Health Medical Services Ltd. Case: Arbitration Petition No. 12 of 2010 Outcome: The Supreme Court disposed of the petition on May 3, 2012, by appointing arbitrators to resolve the dispute. The Court appointed Mr. Ravi Sodhi (Former Additional Advocate General of Punjab) as the first arbitrator and Mr. Trushar Bhavsar (Advocate) as the second arbitrator. These two arbitrators were directed to jointly appoint a third arbitrator. Background & Issue: Super Religare Laboratories (petitioner) provided reference testing services to Good Health Medical Services (respondent) but the respondent failed to pay outstanding invoices totaling Rs. 9,47,344.39 from July-November 2008. After a legal notice in February 2009 and an arbitration notice in January 2010 went unanswered, the petitioner filed this petition seeking arbitrator appointment under the agreement's arbitration clause. Key Direction: The arbitration venue is set as Mumbai (per agreement), though arbitrators may meet elsewhere. The Registry was directed to communicate the order to the arbitrators to expedite proceedings. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case