JEEVAN VIKAS EDUCATION SOCIETY,NAGPUR vs HARIBHAU SANTOSHRAO NIMBALKAR . — C.A. No. 1971/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010211852008

Filing Date

28-Jul-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 1971/2010

Diary Number

21185/2008

Order Date

19-Feb-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JEEVAN VIKAS EDUCATION SOCIETY,NAGPUR

    Adv. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARIBHAU SANTOSHRAO NIMBALKAR .

    Adv. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR ANAGHA S. DESAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 16-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 04-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 01-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 06-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 06-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 02-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 18-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 11-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 28-Jul-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1971/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Civil Appeal No. 1971 of 2010 The Supreme Court allowed Jeevan Vikas Education Society's appeal and set aside the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous. The Court held that reinstatement pursuant to interim orders does not render a writ petition infructuous, as substantive issues including back wages, terminal benefits, and validity of termination require adjudication. The case was remanded to the High Court's single judge for reconsideration and final disposal, with parties encouraged to explore settlement on back wages given the respondent's subsequent retirement in 2004. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case