LIWA EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY, KOTTAPPURAM vs MUSALIYARAKATH ABDUL AZEEZ . — C.A. No. 2991/2011
Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010211282010
Filing Date
10-Jul-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 2991/2011
Diary Number
21128/2010
Order Date
01-Mar-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LIWA EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY, KOTTAPPURAM
Adv. LAWYER S KNIT & CO[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUSALIYARAKATH ABDUL AZEEZ .
Adv. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1] M. P. SHORAWALA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-3] NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-2]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Mar-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Mar-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal
-
23-Feb-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jul-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2991/2011
Summary: LIWA Educational and Charitable Society v. Musaliyarakath Abdul Azeez (C.A. 2991/2011) The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's order that had revoked leave under Section 92 CPC and rejected the plaintiffs' suit. The Court found that both lower courts erred by focusing on Section 92 CPC requirements when the suit's foundation involved a Public Charitable Trust with authorized representatives—making Section 92 CPC inapplicable. The matter was remanded to the Trial Court to determine: (1) whether T.P. Chekku Haji was duly authorized by the society's bye-laws and Executive Committee resolution to institute the suit, and (2) whether the society qualifies as a Public Charitable Trust. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts