LIWA EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY, KOTTAPPURAM vs MUSALIYARAKATH ABDUL AZEEZ . — C.A. No. 2991/2011

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010211282010

Filing Date

10-Jul-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 2991/2011

Diary Number

21128/2010

Order Date

01-Mar-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Appeals Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LIWA EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY, KOTTAPPURAM

    Adv. LAWYER S KNIT & CO[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUSALIYARAKATH ABDUL AZEEZ .

    Adv. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1] M. P. SHORAWALA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-3] NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-2]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Mar-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 01-Mar-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal

  4. 23-Feb-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 22-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 25-Jul-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 04-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 14-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 09-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 25-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 04-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 26-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 14-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 10-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 2991/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: LIWA Educational and Charitable Society v. Musaliyarakath Abdul Azeez (C.A. 2991/2011) The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's order that had revoked leave under Section 92 CPC and rejected the plaintiffs' suit. The Court found that both lower courts erred by focusing on Section 92 CPC requirements when the suit's foundation involved a Public Charitable Trust with authorized representatives—making Section 92 CPC inapplicable. The matter was remanded to the Trial Court to determine: (1) whether T.P. Chekku Haji was duly authorized by the society's bye-laws and Executive Committee resolution to institute the suit, and (2) whether the society qualifies as a Public Charitable Trust. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case