O. K. RADHAKRISHNAN vs V. GEETHA — C.A. No. 6280/2009

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010210852008

Filing Date

26-Jul-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 6280/2009

Diary Number

21085/2008

Order Date

10-Jul-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.O. K. RADHAKRISHNAN

    Adv. K. RAJEEV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V. GEETHA

    Adv. SAJITH. P (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jul-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 10-Jul-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  4. 09-Jul-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  5. 04-Apr-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 31-Mar-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 07-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 14-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 20-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 02-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 20-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 07-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 25-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 20-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 08-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 26-Jul-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6280/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O. K. Radhakrishnan v. V. Geetha (CA No. 6280/2009) The Supreme Court granted a divorce decree on July 10, 2019, recognizing irretrievable breakdown of marriage between appellant O. K. Radhakrishnan and respondent V. Geetha, exercising jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution. The Court found no possibility of reconciliation despite the passage of time and confirmed the marriage had irretrievably broken down. The appeal was disposed with no pending inter se litigation between parties; their child, now a 24-year-old adult, remained with the mother. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case