SHANTHAMMA . vs <font color='red'>K.BASAPPA(D) BY LRS..</font> — SLP(C) No. 10382/2009
Case under Section IV-C. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010210842008
Filing Date
26-Jul-2008
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 10382/2009
Diary Number
21084/2008
Order Date
23-Sep-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed for non-complying conditional Order
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANTHAMMA .
Adv. BALAJI SRINIVASAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.K.BASAPPA(D) BY LRS..
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Sep-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2019
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
15-Jul-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2019
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari
-
08-Mar-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
-
25-Jan-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2019
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
14-Aug-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J) - II
-
09-Jul-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
27-Mar-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Mar-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
15-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer
-
07-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer
-
03-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
05-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Apr-2017
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Oct-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Dec-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Oct-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Jul-2008
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 10382/2009
Summary: On 23-09-2019, the Supreme Court heard SLP(C) No. 10382/2009 filed by Shanthamma & Anr. against K. Ramachandrappa & Ors., arising from a Karnataka High Court judgment dated 31-10-2007. The petitioner's counsel sought adjournment to seek instructions and remove office objections. The Court granted three weeks' time to the petitioners to comply with procedural requirements, with a warning that failure to do so would result in dismissal for non-prosecution. The matter was listed after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts