JEET SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. vs GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VILL.BARA MANSUHA — C.A. No. 5890/2009
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010208512006
Filing Date
18-Aug-2006
Registration No
C.A. No. 5890/2009
Diary Number
20851/2006
Order Date
25-Oct-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JEET SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
Adv. PRAVEEN SWARUP
Respondent(s)
-
1.GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VILL.BARA MANSUHA
Adv. AJAY PAL KAMALDEEP GULATI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Oct-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
02-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2006
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5890/2009
Case Summary: C.A. No. 5890/2009 The Supreme Court of India dismissed the civil appeal filed by Jeet Singh (through legal representatives) against Gram Panchayat of Village Bara Mansuha on October 25, 2017. The Court upheld the High Court of Punjab and Haryana's judgment dated July 20, 2006, finding no merit in the appeal and determining that the High Court's reasoning was lawful and required no interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts