SATYA PRASAD vs MURTI RAM (DEAD) THR. LRS. — C.A. No. 5177/2011
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010207172007
Filing Date
19-Jul-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 5177/2011
Diary Number
20717/2007
Order Date
12-Sep-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATYA PRASAD
Adv. S. R. SETIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.MURTI RAM (DEAD) THR. LRS.
Adv. MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
20-Jul-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
19-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5177/2011
Case Summary: In Civil Appeal No. 5177 of 2011, the Supreme Court heard Satya Prasad's appeal against the High Court's judgment in a dispute with Murti Ram (deceased) and legal representatives. On September 12, 2017, a bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar found no grounds to interfere with the High Court's decision and dismissed the appeal. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts