KALYANJI SOMCHAND MAHESHWARI vs PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ CO.LTD. SUPREINTENDENT ENGINEER — C.A. No. 465/2013

Case under Section III-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010206592011

Filing Date

06-Jul-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 465/2013

Diary Number

20659/2011

Order Date

12-Oct-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALYANJI SOMCHAND MAHESHWARI

    Adv. K. L. JANJANI[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ CO.LTD. SUPREINTENDENT ENGINEER

    Adv. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Oct-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Oct-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  4. 11-Oct-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  5. 04-Oct-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  6. 21-Sep-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  7. 03-Aug-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 03-Aug-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  9. 16-Jul-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Jul-2018

    Ordinary

    Registrar (A-J)

  11. 16-May-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 16-May-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 07-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 03-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 27-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 12-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 04-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 12-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 06-Jul-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 465/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Kalyanji Somchand Maheshwari v. Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. (C.A. No. 465/2013) The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal on October 12, 2023, upholding the High Court's Division Bench judgment. The Court found that the appellant was ineligible for compassionate appointment because his elder brother was already employed with Bharat Petroleum Corporation. Although the appellant's mother submitted two applications—disclosing the brother's employment in the first but concealing it in the second—the appellant's appointment was based on the incomplete application. The Court ruled that internal family arrangements (the brother's separate residence and ration card) cannot override the Standing Order 295's explicit condition denying compassionate employment benefits when any family member is already employed. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case