M/S PRIMELLA SANITARY PRODTS.PVT.L. vs COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GOA — C.A. No. 1535 - 1540/2000

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010201611999

Filing Date

10-Dec-1999

Registration No

C.A. No. 1535 - 1540/2000

Diary Number

20161/1999

Order Date

20-Apr-2005

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S PRIMELLA SANITARY PRODTS.PVT.L.

    Adv. R. N. KESWANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GOA

    Adv. P. PARMESWARAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Apr-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 03-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 16-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 07-Jan-2004

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-Dec-2003

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 10-Dec-1999

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1535 - 1540/2000

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 001535-001540/2000 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeals 1535-1540/2000 and set aside demands for extended period duty/penalties, while upholding demands within the limitation period. The Court held that appellants' counsel made binding concessions that sanitary towels were classifiable under Tariff Item 48.18 (not 56.01), preventing appellants from later challenging this classification. However, the Court set aside the extended limitation period, finding all necessary manufacturing process information was previously disclosed to the Department. Related Appeal (C.A. No. 4365/2003): Dismissed without interference, upholding CEGAT's decision that Primella was entitled to benefit of excise notifications based on valid trademark assignment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case