PARAS RAM vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN . — C.A. No. 7867/2001

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010201232000

Filing Date

29-Nov-2000

Registration No

C.A. No. 7867/2001

Diary Number

20123/2000

Order Date

07-Feb-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAS RAM

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN .

    Adv. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 03-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 06-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 02-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 03-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 26-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 22-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Feb-2008

    Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 14-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 13-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 30-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 09-Dec-2002

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 24-Sep-2001
  19. 11-Sep-2001

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 29-Nov-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7867/2001

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 007867/2001 (Paras Ram v. State of Rajasthan) On 7 February 2011, the Supreme Court disposed of interlocutory applications and a contempt petition. The Court noted that following its 4 October 2010 order directing the writ petitioners to make representations to the State Government, Rajasthan decided the representation on 27 October 2010. The Court disposed of the applications and contempt petition, granting liberty to petitioners to challenge the 27 October 2010 order before the High Court, which shall decide expeditiously after hearing concerned parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case