SUNIL BALI vs UNION OF INDIA . THROUGH SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA — C.A. No. 4445/2010
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010200492009
Filing Date
09-Jul-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 4445/2010
Diary Number
20049/2009
Order Date
27-Feb-2020
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL BALI
Adv. GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA . THROUGH SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA
Adv. SIDDHARTH[R-2] SIDDHARTH[R-3] RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Feb-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2020
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
10-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4445/2010
Case Summary: Sunil Bali v. Union of India (C.A. 4445/2010) The Supreme Court allowed Sunil Bali's appeal, setting aside the High Court's July 2008 judgment that had dismissed his compassionate appointment claim. Bali sought a sweeper or fourth-grade position with the Employees Provident Fund Organisation after his mother (a sweeper) medically retired due to renal failure. The Court found the Commissioner's 2002 rejection order completely unreasoned and rejected lower courts' assumption that Bali's marriage and child meant he must already be gainfully employed. The Court directed the EPFO to reconsider his application within four months without rejecting it on age grounds, since prolonged litigation caused the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts