M.ELANGOVAN vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. REP. BY ITS CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL — C.A. No. 9141/2017

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010198572012

Filing Date

28-Jul-2012

Registration No

C.A. No. 9141/2017

Diary Number

19857/2012

Order Date

17-Jul-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2017 INSC 631

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Disposed off

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.ELANGOVAN

    Adv. S. R. SETIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. REP. BY ITS CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL

    Adv. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Jul-2017

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 17-Jul-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi

  5. 07-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Apr-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 07-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 09-May-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-May-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 09-May-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 15-Sep-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 15-Sep-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Sep-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 09-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 09-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 28-Jul-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9141/2017

  19. [ 2017 INSC 631 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M. Elangovan v. Union of India (C.A. No. 009141/2017) The Supreme Court allowed M. Elangovan's appeal and clarified that the 25% Postman promotion quota must be filled based on seniority alone, without any age cut-off date. The Court rejected the Union's argument that age limits apply to seniority-based promotions. The Court directed that if the appellant is senior enough to be considered for the 25% vacancies, his case shall be considered for promotion with appropriate action taken within two months from the judgment date. The appeal was disposed of on July 17, 2017. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case