MUNICIPAL CORPN OF DELHI vs MANOJ KUMAR . — SLP(C) No. 9667/2010
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010195772009
Filing Date
06-Jul-2009
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 9667/2010
Diary Number
19577/2009
Order Date
26-Jul-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL CORPN OF DELHI
Adv. PRAVEEN SWARUP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANOJ KUMAR .
Adv. ANITHA SHENOY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2013
ROPView PDF
-
13-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
11-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2012
ROPView PDF
-
14-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Feb-2012
ROPView PDF
-
02-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
25-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-Sep-2011
ROPView PDF
-
12-Aug-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
25-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
17-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
03-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
22-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
25-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jul-2009
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 9667/2010
-
04-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of SLP(C) No. 009667/2010 On 26/07/2013, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions filed by Municipal Corporation of Delhi against Manoj Kumar and related respondents. The Court directed the petitioner to implement the High Court's order within six months and clarified that reinstatement of respondents does not arise since they are not in service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts