THE STATE OF BIHAR vs M/S DAYANAND PRD. SINGH AND COMP. — SLP(C) No.(Verified On 27-2-2019)
Case under Section XVI. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010194732018
Filing Date
16-05-2018 06:43 PM
Registration No
SLP(C) No.(Verified On 27-2-2019)
Diary Number
19473/2018
Order Date
01-05-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed on ground of delay
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Adv. NIRANJANA SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1]
Respondent(s)
M/S DAYANAND PRD. SINGH AND COMP.
Adv. MAYANK PANDEY[caveat]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA
Not Taken Up
After Week/Month/Vacation
Administrative Order
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-05-2023 | Not Taken Up |
| 13-04-2023 | After Week/Month/Vacation |
| 20-03-2023 | Administrative Order |
| 02-08-2022 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 04-05-2022 | Fixed Date by Court |
Orders in this case
Case Summary: State of Bihar v. M/S Dayanand Prd. Singh and Comp. The Supreme Court dismissed the State of Bihar's Special Leave Petitions challenging the High Court's rejection of its revision application against an Arbitral Tribunal Award. The High Court had rejected the State's revision as time-barred—filed over two years after the Award when the 90-day limitation period had expired. The State argued the delay was due to its lawyer's failure to inform it of the Award, but the Court rejected this explanation, holding that departmental authorities must remain vigilant in arbitral proceedings and cannot escape responsibility through blame on counsel. Additionally, the Supreme Court itself found the petitions were filed 90-441 days beyond the permitted time limit. The petitions were dismissed on both grounds of delay and merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts