CASTROL INDIA LIMITED THROUGH ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY vs ASSISTANT C.I.T MUMBAI — C.A. No. 551/2012

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010194732011

Filing Date

02-Jul-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 551/2012

Diary Number

19473/2011

Order Date

09-Oct-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CASTROL INDIA LIMITED THROUGH ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY

    Adv. VANDANA SEHGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSISTANT C.I.T MUMBAI

    Adv. ANIL KATIYAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Oct-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan

  3. 12-Sep-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 12-Sep-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan

  5. 02-Jan-2017
  6. 02-Jan-2017
  7. 05-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 18-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 18-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Jan-2015
  12. 07-Jan-2015
  13. 10-Nov-2014
  14. 05-Aug-2014
  15. 08-May-2013
  16. 13-Aug-2012
  17. 30-Jul-2012
  18. 04-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 30-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 31-Oct-2011
  21. 31-Oct-2011
  22. 22-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 08-Aug-2011
  24. 21-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 07-Jul-2011
  26. 02-Jul-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 551/2012

  27. 09-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 05-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 18-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 07-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 11-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 23-Sep-2010
  33. 14-May-2010
  34. 10-May-2010
  35. 03-May-2010
  36. 05-Apr-2010

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 238/2012

Explore other courts

Search Another Case