GOVINDDAS vs K.N.SHARMA — Crl.A. No. 1574 - 1576/2011
Case under 1511Comp-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(matters Filed by the State Government/ Complainant Against Acquittals or Reduction of Sentence.) Section II-E. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010192482010
Filing Date
30-Jun-2010
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1574 - 1576/2011
Diary Number
19248/2010
Order Date
28-Jan-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVINDDAS
Adv. ANIS AHMED KHAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [P-1] RAVI PANWAR[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.K.N.SHARMA
Adv. DEBASIS MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-3] DIVYESH PRATAP SINGH[R-2] DIVYESH PRATAP SINGH[R-1] DIVYESH PRATAP SINGH[R-5] DIVYESH PRATAP SINGH[R-4] DEBASIS MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-5] DEBASIS MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-4] DEBASIS MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-2] DEBASIS MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
28-Jan-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
22-Jan-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
15-Jan-2026
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
22-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Nov-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jun-2010
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1574 - 1576/2011
Summary: Crl.A. No. 001574-001576/2011 On 28-01-2026, the Supreme Court adjourned the case by four weeks after finding that appellant Govinddas (legal representative of the original complainant) has died, requiring his legal representative to be brought on record. Additionally, respondent Sitaram has since deceased, resulting in the appeals against him standing abated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts