UNIWORTH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR — C.A. No. 5217 - 5218/2009

Case under Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010192412009

Filing Date

06-Jul-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 5217 - 5218/2009

Diary Number

19241/2009

Order Date

19-Apr-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNIWORTH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

    Adv. RUPESH KUMAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR

    Adv. A. N. ARORA MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Apr-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 19-Apr-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Ravikumar

  4. 12-Apr-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Ravikumar

  5. 02-Feb-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia

  6. 01-Feb-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia

  7. 19-Jan-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli

  8. 18-Jan-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli

  9. 12-Jan-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli

  10. 11-Jan-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli

  11. 29-Sep-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 29-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  13. 28-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  14. 27-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  15. 22-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  16. 21-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  17. 20-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  18. 15-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  19. 14-Sep-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  20. 26-Jul-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 26-Jul-2022

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy

  22. 21-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 11-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 18-Oct-2012
  25. 08-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 24-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 06-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5217 - 5218/2009

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: Uniworth International Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur (C.A. No. 5217-5218/2009) Uniworth Textiles Limited (EOU) fraudulently mis-declared prime quality textiles as "rejects" to avail concessional duty under Notification No.2/95-CE, selling them to related company Uniworth International Limited. The Commissioner invoked extended limitation period, rejected transaction values, and imposed excise duty and penalties. The Tribunal dismissed appellants' appeals upholding the order. The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals on April 19, 2023, holding: (1) the extended limitation period was validly invoked due to fraudulent mis-declaration; (2) appellants cannot benefit from their own fraud by claiming lack of authority approval for prime goods; (3) valuation under Rule 7 was justified. All pending applications were disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case