M/S. D.N.H. SPINNERS THROUGH ITS PARTNER vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE VAPI — C.A. No. 5032/2009
Case under Indirect Taxation : Central Excise Act, Central Excise Tariff Act Section III-B. Status: DISPOSED.
CNR: SCIN010192212009
Filing Date
06-Jul-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 5032/2009
Diary Number
19221/2009
Order Date
18-Sep-2025
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Data as of 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. D.N.H. SPINNERS THROUGH ITS PARTNER
Adv. RAJEEV KUMAR BANSAL[P-1]
Respondent(s)
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE VAPI
Adv. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-Sep-2025 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 17-Sep-2025 | Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week |
| 11-Sep-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 03-Sep-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 06-Aug-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
Orders
Case Summary: M/S. D.N.H. SPINNERS v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VAPI Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed all appeals (CA No. 5032/2009, 2680/2011, 2910/2011, and 14085/2015). The court held that D.N.H. Spinners' process of purchasing filament yarn or organic polymer (PET Chips) and processing it into textured yarn does not constitute "manufacture of filament yarn" under Notification No. 29/2004-CE, and therefore the company is not entitled to concessional excise duty at 8%. Next Steps: All pending applications stand disposed of. No further directions were issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts