RAJINDER KUMAR vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB HOME AND JUSTICE AFFAIRS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 1527/2014
Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010191972011
Filing Date
30-Jun-2011
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1527/2014
Diary Number
19197/2011
Order Date
27-Jun-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJINDER KUMAR
Adv. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF PUNJAB HOME AND JUSTICE AFFAIRS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Adv. KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Jun-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jun-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
-
17-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jun-2011
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1527/2014
Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed Rajinder Kumar's criminal appeal against his conviction by The State of Punjab in a drug case. The court found no merit to interfere with the lower courts' judgment, considering the quantity of opium seized and the evidence on record. The appeal was not actively pursued further as the appellant had virtually completed his sentence, and any pending applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts