PREM KUMAR PANDEY vs COMNR.U.P.AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD &ORS. — SLP(C) No. 19608/2007
Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010191112007
Filing Date
09-Jul-2007
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 19608/2007
Diary Number
19111/2007
Order Date
15-Feb-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PREM KUMAR PANDEY
Adv. MONIKA GUSAIN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMNR.U.P.AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD &ORS.
Adv. VISHWAJIT SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2007
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 19608/2007
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 019608/2007 On 15/02/2013, the Supreme Court heard Prem Kumar Pandey's special leave petition against the U.P. Housing & Development Board. The Court disposed of the petition, directing the respondents to consider Pandey's claim for three available vacancies in accordance with the High Court's earlier directions, based on counsel's representation that such vacancies existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts