J.K.INDUSTRIES LTD. vs STATE OF KARNATAKA — C.A. No. 5445/2011

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010190612009

Filing Date

06-Jul-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 5445/2011

Diary Number

19061/2009

Order Date

14-Jul-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.J.K.INDUSTRIES LTD.

    Adv. S. N. BHAT (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF KARNATAKA

    Adv. ANITHA SHENOY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 05-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 17-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 16-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 20-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 20-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 05-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 23-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 22-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 25-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 06-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5445/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On July 14, 2011, the Supreme Court heard J.K. Industries Ltd.'s appeals against the Karnataka High Court's judgment dated February 25, 2009. The Court granted leave and allowed the appeals, setting aside both the High Court's order and the Tribunal's order dated October 20, 2005. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration of the dispute, with directions to render a decision within six months while considering new financial affidavits and materials filed before the Supreme Court. Each party was directed to bear its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case