FATEH SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — C.A. No. 4120/2014

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010189572010

Filing Date

25-Jun-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 4120/2014

Diary Number

18957/2010

Order Date

26-Mar-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FATEH SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 28-Jan-2014
  4. 19-Nov-2013
  5. 30-Sep-2013
  6. 22-Aug-2013
  7. 03-Jul-2013
  8. 22-Apr-2013
  9. 12-Mar-2013
  10. 27-Feb-2013
  11. 12-Feb-2013
  12. 08-Jan-2013
  13. 29-Nov-2012
  14. 05-Nov-2012
  15. 05-Nov-2012
  16. 29-Oct-2012
  17. 10-Sep-2012
  18. 13-Aug-2012
  19. 09-Aug-2012
  20. 16-Jul-2012
  21. 12-Jul-2012
  22. 25-Apr-2012
  23. 13-Apr-2012
  24. 04-Apr-2012
  25. 29-Feb-2012
  26. 23-Feb-2012
  27. 23-Jan-2012
  28. 13-Jan-2012
  29. 12-Jan-2012
  30. 14-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 13-Dec-2011
  32. 24-Nov-2011
  33. 11-Nov-2011
  34. 01-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 23-Sep-2011
  36. 23-Sep-2011
  37. 15-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 05-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 11-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 08-Jul-2011
  41. 06-Jul-2011
  42. 20-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 15-Apr-2011
  44. 30-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 25-Jun-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4120/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 004120/2014 (FATEH SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA) The Supreme Court granted leave and condoned the delay in filing a review petition before the High Court. The case involved land acquisition compensation in Panipat, Haryana; the Court found the appellants' delay of 525 days was properly explained and remanded the matter to the High Court for reconsideration on merits within six months, ensuring parity of compensation with other similarly-situated landowners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case